Programme Prioritaire de Recherche Make Our Planet Great Again

Governing destabilisation pathWAYS and Phase-OUT: Pluralising knowledge in support of deliberate low-carbon transitions governance ans strategies

WAYS-OUT

Mots-clés : destabilisation, phase-out, governance, transitions, socio-technical, modelling, trajectories

Résumé

The WAYS-OUT project is oriented by two broad questions:

 

  • Concerning the phenomenon : How can destabilisation be understood & governed? (i.e. how does destabilisation exist as a problem? and how can it be treated?)
  • Concerning the posture and its implications: What does this focal shift (away from novelty) afford on various fields of knowledge and practice?

 

The WAYS-OUT project is also oriented by operational questions:

 

  1. What are the mechanisms and conditions of destabilisation processes?
  2. How can the comparative analysis of destabilisation patterns be pursued?
  3. How to make sense of a variety of destabilisation trajectories?
  4. What governance strategies, interventions, politics are available in relation to destabilisation?
  5. What kinds of knowledge & expertise become (ir)relevant in destabilisation contexts?

 

WAYS-OUT faced a number of difficulties. Some of these are relatively normal and expected difficulties in the lifetime of any project, while others could less easily be anticipated and hence mitigated:

 

Difficulties related to a pandemic. Covid-19 has deeply affected the project, notably in terms of research interactions, access to empirical fieldwork, as well as morale, hence impacting the ‘normal functioning’ of WAYS-OUT (Covid-19 had a destabilising impact). Reduced interaction 1) slowed down the training of early career researchers, notably in relation to the professional socialization process (e.g. taking part in research meetings, conferences, day-to-day lab life), 2) limited the possibilities for external collaborations (e.g. a number of organised events were cancelled, and others not organised due to heightened risk of cancellation), and 3) required a delay or re-think of empirical fieldwork.

 

Difficulties related to research capacity. Inevitably, individuals may move on to other pastures during their professional life. The WAYS-OUT project had to deal with a number of research capacity challenges.

 

Difficulties related to access to empirical data. For some of the case studies, we are discovering some unexpected issues related to access to relevant information.

 

Opportunities arising. We also wanted to flag out some emergent opportunities for WAYS-OUT, such as the recruitment of the project PI, which is an important recognition of the relevance of the research carried out, its significance for French research organisation, and a testimonial of the project impact.

 

L'auteur de ce résumé est le coordinateur du projet, qui est responsable du contenu de ce résumé. L'ANR décline par conséquent toute responsabilité quant à son contenu.

Informations générales

Acronyme projet : WAYS-OUT
Référence projet : 19-MPGA-0010
Région du projet : Île-de-France
Discipline : 6 - SHS
Aide PIA : 481 691 €
Début projet : March 2020
Fin projet : March 2025

Coordination du projet : Bruno TURNHEIM
Email : bruno.turnheim@inrae.fr

Consortium du projet

Etablissement coordinateur : INRAE Centre Ile-de-France - Versailles-Saclay
Partenaire(s) : CNRS Paris Villejuif, AgroParisTech - CAMPUS AGRO PARIS SACLAY, Université Gustave Eiffel

Liens utiles

Explorez notre base de projets financés

 

 

L’ANR met à disposition ses jeux de données sur les projets, cliquez ici pour en savoir plus.

Inscrivez-vous à notre newsletter
pour recevoir nos actualités
S'inscrire à notre newsletter