CE01 - Terre solide et enveloppes fluides 2022

Giant submarine landslides in gas hydrate provinces: a comparison of the Nile and Amazon deep-sea fans – MEGA

Giant submarine landslides in gas hydrate provinces: a comparison of the Nile and Amazon deep-sea fans

Giant submarine landslides (<2000 km3) are present in the Quaternary deposits of passive continental margins but their triggering on low slopes (<2˚) remains enigmatic. The MEGA project is testing the role of gas hydrate dissociation by using the first modelling linking gas hydrate stability, pressure/temperature variations on the seabed and slope stability, and then modelling the tsunamigenic impact of these mega-slides on coastlines.

How are mega-slides triggered and do they represent mega-hazards?

Submarine slope failure is a major process that shapes continental margins around the world. Submarine landslides are particularly common on tectonically active continental margins, where seismic activity, combined with steep seabed slopes (10-15°) and high sediment input, cause frequent (10-100 years) but relatively small-volume (0.001-0.01 km3) ruptures. However, the largest known submarine landslides are located on passive continental margins, which are generally considered to present a low risk due to their low seismic activity and low-angle slopes (generally <2°). Compared with landslides on active margins, ‘mega-slides’ occur less frequently (1,000 to 10,000 years) but involve larger volumes of sediment (10-2000 km3). While variations in sea level cause fluctuations in sediment supply and in situ interstitial fluid pressures , it is difficult to explain, from a mechanical point of view, how such large landslides can be triggered on such gentle slopes (<2°) in the absence of a triggering factor such as seismicity or the presence of layers of weakness. The aim of our project is to answer the main questions concerning the causes and mechanisms of the triggering of submarine mega-slides on passive continental margins. Although these causes can be complex and include multiple pre-conditioning and triggering factors, we have chosen to focus the project on testing hypotheses relating mega-slides to the spatio-temporal dynamics of gas hydrates. In particular, the project will test the two main hypotheses available according to which mega-slides could be generated 1) by the thinning of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ) in response to climate forcing associated with glacial-interglacial cycles (downward dynamics), and/or 2) by fluctuations in the circulation of deep fluids towards the surface and the expulsion of gas (upward dynamics). The project will also assess the tsunamigenic consequences of mega-slides on coastlines, to answer the question: do mega-slides imply mega-hazards? To date, efforts to address these issues have focused on mega-slides and/or gas hydrate systems in disconnected study areas. To achieve our objectives, we propose a new and innovative comparison of two study areas, the deep-sea fans of the Amazon and the Nile, located on margins that have undergone different forms of glacial-interglacial climate forcing. The project partners have large dataset that have already been used to analyse mega-slides and gas hydrates in these two areas.

The project is based on the integration of observation of natural phenomena using geophysical, geological and geochemical data, and numerical simulations.

1. Observation of fluid seepages/gas hydrate and mega-slides.

Characterising the seabed morphologies and subsurface architectures of fluid seepages associated with gas hydrates, and mega-slides from geophysical and geological data will enable us to understand the extent and characteristics of the gas hydrate system in each deep-sea fan, and to constrain their relationships with the distribution of structures facilitating the upward migration of fluids towards the seabed. The innovation will come from the use of deep learning to automatically detect and map fluid outflows on the seabed.

The mega-slides will be identified and mapped using geophysical data, then their stratigraphic periods of emplacement will be estimated and compared with climato-eustatic variations. This will make it possible to estimate their dynamics (single giant ruptures or multiple small and stacked landslides) and assess their translation mechanisms (fast or slow movement).

2. Modelling the dynamics of gas hydrates, the triggering of mega-slides and tsunamis.

The dynamics of gas hydrates will be modelled using an innovative combination of two software packages: on a basin scale using TemisFlow to estimate the quantities of microbial and thermogenic gases generated and their migration in the 10 km thick sedimentary pile; and on the scale of the GHSZ close to the seabed (<0. 5 km) using Tough+Hydrate to understand the dynamics of gas hydrates in response to the climato-eustatic forcing, and variations in heat and upward fluid/gas fluxes. The palaeo-temperatures of the bottom water will be estimated using Mg/Ca analyses carried out on the benthic foraminifera from the cores.

Simulation of the triggering of mega-slides will provide scenarios of slope failures associated with the dissociation of gas hydrates. Commercial finite-element software (OPTUM G2) will be used to quantify the reduction in resistance and pore fluid pressure conditions that could explain this triggering despite the low-angle slopes. Representative mechanical properties of the sediments will be obtained from existing boreholes and from geotechnical measurements carried out on the cores.

The formation of tsunamis in response to mega-landslides will be assessed in the Eastern Mediterranean and South Atlantic using previous results. This is of great scientific and societal importance, as historical mega landslides are unknown, as is the intensity of their impact on densely populated coastlines. This work will use the numerical code Shaltop, which simulates the displacement of landslides, coupled with the 3D Navier-Stokes code Freshkiss3d.

Halfway through the project, the first two tasks of observing natural phenomena have been completed for the two deep-sea fans of the Nile and the Amazon. The first task concerns the identification, mapping and characterisation of all the geological structures present at or near the seabed. The second task concerns the identification, characterisation and dating of mega-slides during the Plio-Quaternary period.

For task 1, we concentrated on the recognition and analysis of the same geological objects within the two study areas. These correspond to 1) fluid-seepage structures (mud volcanoes and pockmarks, presence of mudflows on the seabed and plumes of gas bubbles in the water column), 2) indicators of the presence of gas hydrates (BSR), 3) tectonic structures (faults, folds) linked to the gravitational collapse of the two deep-sea fans, 4) submarine landslide features (scars, erosive conduits, mass-transport deposits, compression ridges, debris flow deposits), 5) sedimentary architectures (canyons, channels, dunes).

For Task 2, using seismic data, we extended the stratigraphic interval studied to the Upper Miocene. On the Amazon, we have identified 25 very large mega-slides (200-20000 km3), the largest of which may correspond to the superposition of several smaller slides. On the Nile, 21 mega-slides of smaller volume (10-2000 km3) were identified, each corresponding to an individual event.

This work shows that the two study areas contain comparable structures, but in different proportions and with different characteristics. Mapping through the development of deep learning methods has been successful in analysing the fluid seepages associated with the escape of gas into the ocean, providing results that still require further investigation. Hundreds of fluid seepages have been recognised in the two study areas, forming distinct populations that are in different relationships with the BSR, which takes the form of discontinuous ‘patches’ associated with tectonic structures. On the Amazon cone, the BSR is strongly associated with the crests of anticlines, which are also the sources of the fluid overpressures at the origin of mud volcanism. On the Nile cone, the BSR tends to be associated with basins bounded by extensional faults, which contain little or no fluid seepages; on the other hand, pockmarks are abundant along the westward slope where faults do not cut the seafloor but are buried beneath stacked mega-slides. The seafloor of both deep-sea fans is heavily affected by landslide scars and associated deposits, the characteristics of which suggest that fast-dynamic landslides are predominant.

Once the tasks of observing and characterising natural phenomena had been completed, we began the first two modelling tasks.

For task 3, the typical architectures of the two margins of the Amazon and the Nile were finalised for import into TemisFlow.

For task 4, a synthetic depth section was validated for each of the two margins in order to begin the first slope stability modelling tests.

Giant submarine landslides (10-2000 km3) are found in the thick Quaternary sediment succession of passive continental margins. Their ages coincide with periods of sea-level fall and rise, but it is unclear how such vast failures can be triggered on low seafloor slopes (<2?) in the absence of a triggering factor such as seismicity. Key hypotheses involve excess pore pressures linked to reductions in gas-hydrate stability, driven by changes either in climate or in subsurface fluid flow. The MEGA project wants to explore such hypotheses through the first modelling of linked changes in gas hydrate and slope stability in response to ocean pressure and temperature changes, using an innovative comparison of the Nile and Amazon deep-sea fans that experience different forms of climate forcing over glacial-interglacial timescales. As such megaslides have never triggered in historical times, MEGA will provide input for the first modelling of their tsunamogenic consequences on coastal zones.

Project coordination

Sebastian Migeon (Géoazur)

The author of this summary is the project coordinator, who is responsible for the content of this summary. The ANR declines any responsibility as for its contents.

Partnership

ISTEP Institut des sciences de la Terre Paris
GEOAZUR Géoazur
EPOC Environnements et paléoenvironnements océaniques et continentaux
INRIA Centre de Recherche Inria de Paris

Help of the ANR 533,348 euros
Beginning and duration of the scientific project: January 2023 - 36 Months

Useful links

Explorez notre base de projets financés

 

 

ANR makes available its datasets on funded projects, click here to find more.

Sign up for the latest news:
Subscribe to our newsletter