CE26 - Innovation, travail

Biais sexistes dans l'attribution de financement – GIGA

Submission summary

Gender equity is one of the determinants of economic growth, social development and well-being. It was the case for the economic development during the era of industrial development; it is probably, even more, the case in the knowledge economy, where scientific advance is a key element of human progress.
Despite the general agreement on gender equity benefits, women have been found to have lower salaries than men, to encounter greater difficulties in obtaining career promotions and in accessing resources. While women are increasingly participating in science, they still have difficulties in succeeding and the scientific community is debating about the reasons behind the phenomenon.
The overarching objective of GIGA is to assess gender bias in research funding. Research grants are critical resources that can affect researchers’ scientific productivity and career progress. Nowadays, the ability to raise funds is becoming a base in the evaluation of scientists’ performances along with publication record. In this context, access to grants is crucial for any researcher.
In recent years, funding agencies and policymakers have attempted to develop guidelines to promote female scientists’ participation in competitions for research funding. The rationale of these efforts is the concern that women have a lower propensity to apply for grants and, eventually, to access financial resources. On the one hand, a series of contextual factors could explain differences in the likelihood to apply, such as family burden, the presence of female role-models, and diverse networks. On the other hand, the causes of female under-representation among the applicants for grants may be traced back to the grant allocation process, that is, the selection process carried out by evaluators.
GIGA aims to explore the funding process throughout all its phases: the application phase as well as the awarding phase. In the application phase researchers self-select themselves to participate in the competition. In the awarding phase, a committee of experts select the applications that deserve funding support.
This study aims to acquire novel insights on the impact of gender bias on research funding mechanisms at both applicant and evaluator (referee and panel) level, and to explore the role played by confounding factors (i.e. career, scientific productivity, network and novelty) in the allocation of grants. To this end, GIGA puts forward an analysis through both dimensions: the application process and the selection process of grant applications.
We exploit a unique large database from the European Science Foundation (ESF) covering information on a large funding scheme over the period 2003-2014, namely the EUROpean COllaborative RESearch Scheme (EUROCORES). The scheme encouraged researchers to network and collaborate across Europe and a number of other countries to promote interdisciplinary basic research activities and to disseminate the results, thereby opening new horizons in science. As a ‘bottom-up’ support to collaborative research projects, EUROCORES scheme represents a crucial opportunity to reveal ‘intrinsic’ biases in the allocation of grants in many aspects, including gender biases. The database includes about 1600 projects, more then 10.000 applicants, about 2400 external reviewers and more then 300 panel members.
We will exploit the information both quantitatively (by using relevant econometrical methods) and qualitatively (via interviews and survey) . We expect that GIGA will influence the current research on gender by proposing a holistic view that goes beyond the simple identification of gender bias in the allocation of grants.
This project will provide empirical support to funding organizations and policymakers to design policies aimed at reducing gender bias in the allocation of funds and increasing the number of women participating in the competition for grant attribution.

Project coordinator

Monsieur Patrick Llerena (Bureau d'économie théorique et appliquée (UMR 7522))

The author of this summary is the project coordinator, who is responsible for the content of this summary. The ANR declines any responsibility as for its contents.


BETA _ UNISTRA Bureau d'économie théorique et appliquée (UMR 7522)
UNS - GREDEG Université NIce Sophia Antipolis - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion

Help of the ANR 313,200 euros
Beginning and duration of the scientific project: September 2019 - 36 Months

Useful links

Sign up for the latest news:
Subscribe to our newsletter